The Tapestry Early Years Survey 2026
A Data Report by Tapestry
Survey Open 23rd April - 29th May 2026
Since 2020, we’ve asked the early years sector how it’s really doing. This year, 637 early years educators told us what’s happening on supervision, Ofsted readiness, and the fast-rising use of AI in their day-to-day work.
Here’s what they said.
Staff Supervision
More than a tick-box exercise
Supervision isn’t just a box to tick for early years staff – over three quarters of those who took part in the survey cited that it helps them to manage stress and workload, improves their wellbeing, and offers a sense of belonging.
believe staff supervision is very or extremely important
only get supervision once or twice a year
said the quality of their supervision affects whether they’d stay in their role
What's limiting the effectiveness of supervision?
Respondents could select multiple answers.
How often does supervision happen?
Not everyone agreed that supervision needed to happen more often.
A couple of respondents pushed back the other way:
"[Supervision is] too frequent so lack things to talk about as talk to staff all of the time anyway."
"[Supervision is] too often, it needs to be termly and if I have a problem I can go to the manager anytime."
Only a small minority, but their words serve as a useful reminder that “more supervision” isn’t a universal fix; frequency has to match need for it to be effective.
Trusting educators supports their growth
Supporting educators isn’t about ticking boxes or chasing data targets; it’s about trust. When staff feel genuinely valued for who they are, not just what percentages they hit, they’re better able to attune to children’s needs. In the video below, Stephen and Becca of Tapestry’s in-house Education Team explore why performance management should be person-focused, not just process-focused.
Supervision: Key Takeaways
Early years educators value supervision, but workforce pressure is making it harder to access.
Nearly half said supervision quality is a factor in their choice to stay in their current role.
Time, not willingness, is the real blocker, but its not just frequency – supervision also has to be useful.
Want to revisit supervision in your setting? Tapestry’s co-founder, Dr Helen Edwards, has put together a comprehensive Beginner’s Guide to Staff Supervision, packed with useful information on statutory guidance, what Ofsted are expecting and best practices. The guide also contains worksheets, with space to answer reflective questions, come up with ideas and make additional notes.
There are two versions of the guide; one that can be printed and written on, and one that you can save to your computer or device and fill in digitally.
Ofsted and inclusion
Prepared, but not always clear
Despite ongoing debate about the new inspection framework, most settings said they felt ready for Ofsted’s focus on inclusion – even if the guidance itself could be clearer.
told us they feel very well prepared for Ofsted’s inclusion focus
A further 32% felt they were moderately prepared, which means nearly 9 in 10 early years educators feel at least moderately ready for Ofsted’s inclusion focus, even amid ongoing debate about the new inspection framework.
A further 32% felt they were moderately prepared, which means nearly 9 in 10 early years educators feel at least moderately ready for Ofsted’s inclusion focus, even amid ongoing debate about the new inspection framework.
said they feel very confident they could evidence inclusive practice if inspected tomorrow
of respondents believe that Ofsted’s guidance on inclusion is clear
How confident do educators feel evidencing inclusive practice?
Confidence seemed to follow a similar shape to preparedness – most educators landed somewhere between “very” and “fairly” confident, with only 1 in 10 saying they wouldn’t feel confident at all if inspected tomorrow.
Inclusion Is Just Good Teaching
Is inclusion its own separate strategy, or just what good teaching already looks like? In this video, Stephen makes the case that high-quality inclusion comes down to knowing your children well, rather than a standalone document ticking a box.
Inclusion: Key Takeaways
Early years educators feel more prepared for Ofsted’s inclusion focus than the wider sector narrative suggests.
Confidence is real, but guidance could be sharper: a third want more clarity, not more pressure.
Looking for more resources around inclusion in educational settings? Tapestry’s SEND Advisor and Outreach Teacher, Stephen Kilgour, has written/co-written several guides on responsive provision, as well as created a downloadable library of free support and timetable symbols for educators to use in their settings and schools.
Opens on our Education site
Use of AI
The sector's quiet AI adoption
AI use among early years educators has jumped since last year, but guidance and training don’t appear to have kept pace.
+ 13pts increase in AI use since the 2025 survey
of these said AI is saving them time on admin and paperwork
How it's grown:
Last year, a third (33%) of early years educators told us they’d used AI. This year, that’s up to 46% – the clearest sign yet that AI has moved from experiment to habit for a growing share of the sector.
What they're using it for:
How much time is it saving?
Nearly half of the respondents who said they are using AI (45%) claim to be saving 1–3 hours a week.
Almost 1 in 10 (9%) said they are saving 5+ hours a week.
But educators feel guidance is still unclear
Only 31% of settings have provided guidance on using AI to their staff, with only 21% providing any training.
55% said they’d need more training to get the most out of AI before attempting to use it.
Thinking of introducing AI tools as part of your workflow? Early Childhood Technology and Online Safety Advisor Richard Waite gave us a simple list of 5 Do’s and Don’ts for using AI in the Early Years to help you get started.
Why some aren't using AI
Respondents could select multiple answers.
For the 27% who feel AI has no place in early years, the objection often isn’t about the sector at all, it’s environmental and ethical:
"I think AI is environmentally, and morally, disastrous and actively avoid using it in my personal and professional lives."
"AI uses vast amounts of fresh water, pollutes areas in its immediate vicinity, and is trained on stolen data. It also is highly flawed and often 'hallucinates', thus proving it to be a poor and sometimes dangerous tool."
"AI is awful. AI is going to reduce productivity. Read books instead."
Others simply said it was “unnecessary,” or that they “do not agree with AI” – a stance, rather than a skills or knowledge gap.
Some practitioners however are using AI more as a tool to support the work they already do:
"I teach childminders how to use AI safely, efficiently and uniquely to their setting. It's now a CPD-approved course."
"I use AI as a tool only to help me write targets and strategies for the graduated approach. I always then put it into my own words. It is important to use AI as a tool and not a reliable way to work."
That range, from outright refusal to CPD-accredited training, is telling: only around a quarter of the surveyed sector object to AI in principle. For most of the rest, it isn’t resistance holding them back, but practical barriers – time, confidence, and knowing where to start.
Use of AI: Key Takeaways
AI adoption in early years is accelerating fast, faster than sector guidance can keep up.
1 in 4 educators believe AI has no place in early years at all, often on environmental or ethical grounds rather than practicality.
Are you AI ready? Tapestry Education Team members Jack Dabell and Ben Case explore the increase in AI use in the early years sector, and provide some practical steps for nursery managers and policy-writers who are interested in using AI in their setting, or wish to provide guidance to their staff who may already be using it.
Opens on our Education site
Appendix: who we surveyed
Overall, 980 people began the survey, with 637 from the early years sector participating beyond the background questions.
Their roles:
Qualified responses came from educators working within the early years sector, with strong representation from managers, practitioners, and childminders:
- Childminder – 229
- Early Years Practitioner – 181
- Early Years Manager – 223
- Early Years Teacher – 49
- Reception Teacher – 54
- SENCo (Early Years Setting) – 23
- Trainee EYFS – 6
- Other (Within Early Years) – 215
Responses to the individual questions varied and were lower than the overall sample size. Percentages have been rounded to nearest whole number.
Related Reading
Curious how this year’s themes connect to what we’ve heard before? A few threads worth following: